The Public Education Crisis in America – What Are We Going to Do to Fix It?

Public school reform seems to be on people’s minds this week.  There is no denying we have problems with the quality of our educational system these days.  I am reminded regularly by such things as The Tonight Show’s “Jay Walking” segments.  If you haven’t seen them, they are uncomfortably laughable interviews where Jay asks random passersby what amounts to basic high school level knowledge and/or trivia questions. It is a revealing look into just how far the average American has fallen in terms of knowledge and awareness of current events, what they find important, etc.  It is actually quite a sad telling of the state of education in the United States of America.

This past Friday evening, February 3, 2012, my good friend Gerry shared with me and others this youtube video regarding the state of education in a Washington school.  I have mentioned Gerry in other posts here at Wake Up.  Gerry has been my mother’s “boyfriend” since I was about ten years old.  Whether he wanted to or not, he played a key role in me holding the views I do today regarding the government and liberty.

So he sends this video without any other commentary.  Just the link.

My reply:

Maybe we should budget more federal tax dollars toward public education.  That will help these students learn.
We need more teachers, more computers in the class rooms, and more more more.  Hopefully the U.S. Dept. of Education will introduce more federal laws to help the miserable states’ and localities get their educational systems in order.

Then his reply:

Robert,
You surprise me…you seem to be thinking like a Dim-ocrat.  For Progressives whenever a gubmint program isn’t working it’s not because it’s a stupid program it’s because they haven’t spent enough $’s.  So their solution is to spend even more on the program.
In this particular case…the feral gubmint should budget less (or none) tax dollars [not more] towards public education and reduce (or eliminate) feral education laws [not introduce more].  As John Stossel’s recent special on education easily demonstrated private education costs less for the taxpayer, results in better paid teachers and ends up with significantly better educated students and test scores.
Gerry    
PS.  On the other hand…your email may be totally sarcastic.  If so, I apologize.  As I often told you “I have a hard time recognizing sarcasm”.  <Emoticon3.gif>
To which I responded:
Ger,I thought for sure that you knew me much better than that!  My reply was indeed 100% SARCASM.  The federal government putting more public resources towards the issue is the exact problem not the solution.  Poor progressives fail to recognize the negative self reinforcing feedback loop with their non-stop willingness to put education under greater and greater central control.  What the USA needs is an incentive for taxpayers to opt their kids out of public schools.  Or at the very least, a dissolution of U.S. Dept of Education in order to free the states to use their resources as their citizens see fit.  The feds penalizing states for not adhering to the ridiculous educational mandates of Big Brother is wrong and is a 10th amendment issue if ever there was one.  Sadly there are no more checks and balances to separate the powers between the branches, just one big miserable worthless government run amok and digging us into a deeper hole..I served you up the “gopher ball” and you did just as I was hoping.  You hit it out of the ballpark with the exact response I was hoping to see.  On more positive note, it looks like Ron Paul and his ideals are catching on to more and more people this coming election cycle.
Yours in Liberty,
Rob
Leading to this reply from Gerry’s 92 year old father who is one of may 10 others on the distribution.  His Dad Ray is a very loving, decent and kind man who happens to be a self professed socialist / liberal.  We engage in these types of exchanges all the time:
ALL THIS GRIPING AND ALL THE WHILE THE ECONOMY IS STEADILY IMPROVING. SAIL ON BELOVED BELOVED SHIP. SAIL ON TO GREATER AND GREATER HEIGHTS. 
RAY
Apparently, this is an issue on other peoples’ minds as well.  Here is my reply back to the group as of this morning.
Our exchange of opinions on this issue these past few days is not exclusive to us.  The Daily Press newspaper down here in Hampton Roads, VA had this as its  published Editorial this past Saturday.

http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-edt-schoolchoice-editorial-20120204,0,5492520.story

dailypress.com

An argument for school choice

9:26 PM EST, February 4, 2012

In the world of business, when one company has a monopoly on the market, there is less incentive to be effective or efficient. Healthy competition, on the other hand, fosters growth and success.

The same can be applied to educational systems.

Providing alternatives that create competition for traditional public schools is but one of the compelling reasons Virginia should consider school choice, a movement that would help parents select the best option for their children’s education, particularly those who are frustrated by declining or stagnant performance at their local schools.

The traditional model, in which government provides everyone with a “free education” generously underwritten by the taxpayers, might be sufficient if school performance were consistently high, most dollars were devoted to direct instruction, and the best teachers were rewarded and the weakest let go.

But that isn’t the case today.

And throwing more money at the problem — which we’ve continued to do even though it hasn’t worked — is impractical due to falling state tax revenues and reductions in federal support.

Many states are by necessity undertaking reforms aimed at correcting the deeply entrenched obstacles to improvement by adopting merit pay and contractual review policies and by reducing non-instructional budgets. Gov. McDonnell has pushed for such improvements in the current legislative session.

Improving efficiency and shoring up quality and accountability at existing schools has to be at the forefront of Virginia’s educational reforms. But school choice could be an important component, as well.

School choice includes a range of options, both public and private. Public school choices include charter schools, magnet schools and open enrollment plans that allow students to choose among multiple schools within a district or region. Private school options include faith-based and other private schools supported by tuition and donations, virtual schools and home schools.

At a town meeting last week hosted by Hampton University, panel members weighed in on why black Americans especially need to support school choice in their communities. While rich families have always had the opportunity to choose private schools, poor families — who are often stuck in the worst-performing schools — don’t have those options.

As the panelists noted, the best way to get at the problem is to break loose from the notion that school funding is for schools; rather, it is for students. In fact, school funding formulas are based on student population, which can lead to an administration’s protective hold on their students instead of encouraging them to go where there needs could be better met.

School vouchers — payments to parents from public tax funds to be used for a child’s education expenses — allow educational decisions to be made on an individual basis instead of one-size-fits-none. Voucher programs can also be tied to stipulations against discrimination and even include needs-based funding ranges. Arguments that voucher payments to private schools violate the First Amendment and similar state constitutional provisions have been successfully countered with reasoning such as (1) the private schools are not all faith-based and (2) payments are made to parents, not to schools.

And despite the fears that less funding will be available for public schools if vouchers are used, systems that have explored vouchers, such as in Milwaukee, are finding them to be a potentially more efficient way of educational delivery. Since vouchers are typically less than the actual per-student allotment and overhead costs are reduced, schools can actually save money by implementing them.

Going forward, Virginia should continue to monitor and explore the options for school choice, including evaluating the success of existing voucher programs both in terms of costs and performance.

An important caveat: The issues and arguments do not and should not “belong” to any single special-interest group, religion, race, geographic region or political party.  The school choice movement can benefit everyone.

School choice, when combined with significant reform of our public schools, is one way to accomplish a major shift in our dysfunctional educational system. It’s time for a serious look.

Copyright © 2012, Newport News, Va., Daily Press