I can not write enough good words about how promising these two liberty focused initiatives are for actually doing something that can effectively combat the problem of the State that pretends is our federal government. Please read the information on the other side of the link below and consider supporting one or the other or both. I support the foundation and its Zero Aggression Project.
The message is clear and many citizens have known this problem for years. So now what do we do? http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-edt-spending-editorial-20120708,0,2415744.story
As we celebrate another Memorial Day weekend, let’s give pause to pay homage to the brave men and women who paid the ultimate price to secure our freedoms. There was a time long ago when the government of the United States of America respected the natural rights of man to be free. As a result of the American Revolutionary War that saw great sacrifice, bloodshed, and loss of life, our nation was established on the principles of limited government. It was recognized and respected that the people are endowed with certain unalienable rights and the government is given its limited authority from the people through very specific and enumerated powers as charted in our Constitution.
Fast forward to today. The world is a much smaller, more connected, and very different place from what it was in the late 18th century when our country was founded and the Constitution was enacted. Despite the changes in international relations and the technological advances that have advanced human civilization, the natural rights of man remain a timeless philosophy backed by the principles of liberty. These concepts serve as the bulwark of our society of freedom loving people. The rights and the laws that protect them should not be tampered with, regardless of geopolitical current events.
Recent congressional votes from 1st District Republican representative Rob Wittman can only lead to the conclusion that he no longer believes that the USA is the land of the free and the home of the brave. How else can he explain his “yea” vote on the NDAA with its American citizen terror suspect detention authority given to the military as directed by the President? How else can Wittman explain his “nay” vote that would have amended that provision just 2 weeks ago to remove the unconstitutional power of the military to detain American citizens without due process? It was reported that he thought long and hard about his “nay” vote on the Smith-Amash amendment but decided it was more important to violate the constitution in the name of safety so as to assure that terror suspects would not have more rights on our soil than U.S. military service members under the United Stated Code of Military Justice.
Being afraid to uphold and defend the constitution as per the once revered congressional oath of office now seems to be a prerequisite to serve as a member in congress. With all of the “protection” and “security” federal laws already on the books (TSA full body pat downs and searches at airports, NSA wire tapping under FISA, and Real ID to just list a few), American people have a better chance of winning the jackpot lotto, drowning in their bath tub, or getting struck by lightening than they do getting harmed or killed by a terrorist here in the United States.
Wittman’s and congress’s spineless and gutless approach to securing our liberty through the destruction of the 4th Amendment to our Constitution is yet another sad and disrespectful way to memorialize the Patriots who fought for our freedoms and founded our nation. Ironically, liberally appointed Federal district Judge Katherine B. Forrest issued a preliminary injunction barring such detentions of American citizens on the ground that the law is unconstitutional. Unlike the supposedly constitutionally conservative Wittman, perhaps she appreciates the warnings that founder Benjamin Franklin alluded to when he opined that those who sacrifice liberty in pursuit of security are deserving of neither. Wittman fails to realize that we will have to pay hell to regain our freedoms that he just voted away. Home of the brave…yeah, right….apparently not any more when it comes to our Congress. Try and feel proud about your Memorial Day tomorrow.
My writing has slowed quite dramatically this past month or so. It seems that not much is really happening that inspires me to write. I mean, how much can any body rail against socialism and big government before it becomes redundant? So what else is there to write?
Things taking place now for which I am paying attention none the less are:
So as the above plays out, I lay low. I get up, go to work, come home, enjoy some rest and relaxation with my family and do it again…wondering how long all of it is going to last.
After reading what I just wrote below, this is sort of a disjointed non-cohesive writing. I appreciate your indulgence should you choose to proceed. Thanks in advance – Robert 🙂
Super Tuesday has come and gone. This is one of the busier days of the primary season leading up to the November 2012 general and presidential election. This is the second consecutive presidential election campaign cycle that I have supported Ron Paul.
In between these two election cycles, I spent some of my free time attempting to be efficiently politically active in relating to my opposition to various congressional activities that are eroding freedom in the U.S.A.
Most people reading these words would agree that beyond the 2010 Republican house cleaning, not much seems to have changed in the “Big Brother and Big Government” landscape. I am so very much looking forward to the Supreme Court of the U.S.A giving Obamacare its day in court. That noted, I know I am also setting myself up for a let down, because I find it almost a no-brainer that the Patient Protection – Affordable Health Care act is a Constitutional abomination. If I see it as clearly being a no-no from a constitutional perspective, then I believe the liberal appointees to the Court will rule it as permissible. Hence the let down.
A problem with the judiciary process as it stands today seems to be the issue of bad case law being allowed to remain in effect. Previous judicial opinions set precedent upon which future decisions are handed down from other courts. I could never quite wrap my mind around the issue of what if decisions that are delivered are wrong – even if the final decision is upheld on appeal? That then leaves future courts to lean on these erroneous decisions, until at some point further into the future, all court cases have their decisions based on faulty application of the law. What I am describing is a domino effect built on case law that gets further and further away from proper application of constitutional interpretation. This seems to have been happening for the last 70 years.
Let me be clear that I know I am not a lawyer and will gladly cede superiority in this regard to the constitutional scholars. But I am confident that the interpretation of the law will continue to be misconstrued and applied the more errant decisions are allowed to stand and serve as bulwark for future decisions. That is why the Supreme Court nominating process is so important to conservatives. We need a qualified judiciary to protect our constitutional rights from being trampled through erroneous legislative and regulatory outcomes.
Coming back from the sidetrack musing, it appears that my candidate Ron Paul is not doing well in the popular vote process that will lead to the GOP nomination for the 2012 presidential nomination. That noted, the key is to seat delegates, and the mainstream media is not even reporting much on the dedicated base that Ron Paul has working at the grass roots level to secure delegates at the various local, district, and national GOP conventions. With providential intervention, perhaps we can get some influence in the process. I was left feeling defeated after the 2008 campaign.
So while we wait to see how this campaign process plays out, I will get a “fix” on repairing the damage from Obamacare by tracking the Supreme Court hearing and sending out Tweets, emails, and posting my thoughts here on this blog.
Lately though, all of my energy and action put towards this effort of trying to remain free has exacted somewhat of a toll on me. I know I can’t be alone in this regard. There are hundreds of thousands of people who are supporting Ron Paul and the cause for saving Liberty. If you find yourself feeling alone and frustrated and stressed out at the recurring letdowns that your efforts to push back big government are not yielding the results that you would like to see, then it might be time to try something different.
I decided to take a few weeks off from it. I wanted to clear my head and spirit. So I read a fiction book and tried to distance myself as much as I could from the politics and news. Coming back from that, I am thinking I want to try a different tact and just share my thoughts with others. In support of that, I am also trying to introduce more people to an two organizations that can help by carrying the load, allowing me to be reminded that I am not alone. These organizations are The Campaign For Liberty and Downsize DC.
I am glad that I am blessed to have the mind and personality to not fall in lockstep with the masses and that I can think and act on my own accord. But sometimes that can stress the heck out of you and derail you from wanting to continue. A good way to recover from the stresses of this worldview is to connect with like minded individuals who share your viewpoints. We are not alone. The passions that fan the flames of freedom lie within all of us and we are all inextinguishable. Stay strong and stay passionate.
Recent news accounts like this of the FBI’s announcement that it has concerns with people who claim themselves to be Sovereign Citizens evokes thoughts of our country’s founding. The patriots who were associated with country’s founding fathers had to consider the threat of apprehension by the authorities when they were contemplating whether or not to break free from the rule of King George and Great Britain. It is no small thing to break free from an established government. That is why the American Revolution was so historic in the annals of human history.
Sovereign Citizens have taken a different interpretation of current prevailing viewpoints of what it means to be an American and living in the United States. In essence, they seem to want to separate themselves from the current laws of the land and live by a different set of rules from the mainstream citizens. They appear to describe the current laws as illegitimate when pitted against the rights American are described as having as written in the Constitution. In the video that runs on their website, the woman makes a reference to the USA as a corporation to which the Sovereign Citizens do not want to participate. I have come across other references about this Corporation over the years and have been interested in learning more about it but then abandoning the issue altogether due to time constraints and thoughts about what does it really matter any way? Maybe the Sovereign Citizens just had more time and interest in seeing what it is all about. I am not sure.
Today in the year 2012, the vast majority of citizens are law abiding taxpayers of which many have serious concerns and objections about how our elected / appointed representatives are managing our national, state, and local governments. It would be members of this segment of American society who organized the Tea Party and /or might be active in the Libertarian political party. Many people who follow the current rules of the electoral and political system have expended a good many years of their lives and personal resources to try and get more Constitutionally compliant leaders into government at all levels.
Anybody who has followed American political events over the past 70 years knows that the Republicans and Democrats backed by highly financed special interest groups have claimed wins in most if not all major political campaigns for public office. It would be very frustrating for any normal person to begin to think that there has to be a better way to push back the problem of the wrong people being elected to run the government because they have what appears to be an inappropriate ability to wield greater influence than a majority of most individual citizens in the election.
Maybe that is what led to this group that calls themselves Sovereign Citizens. When I think of them and why they do what they do, there is a part of me that can sort of relate and understand and maybe even agree with the rationale as to why they would want to “not play by the rules” of the prevailing form of government.
Let me be clear, I do not condone violence and aggression against other people including the lawful authorities. That noted, for purposes of trying to understand their behavior and actions so as to learn and maybe improve the situation that is causing the FBI to escalate their surveillance of this group, perhaps Sovereign Citizens simply have more courage to push back and defend themselves from the government in a fashion that based on their political beliefs, can lead to what looks like violence and aggression against the State.
Obviously there is a stigma that mainstream society attaches to people who are members of such fringe groups. But I get a sense that the fringe is growing. Maybe the Sovereign Citizens are just an early version, a way-out in-front organized group ahead of the game. Sooner or later it seems inevitable that more and more supposedly Free People who have become frustrated with their government run amok would form in this coalesced fashion if unable to realize the changes they see as being needed to save their way of life because of a corrupted and unconstitutional electoral and political system and government.
What I wrote above does not seem to differ much with what Thomas Jefferson and the Founders had to wrestle with when they decided to break free from Great Britain. On the outset of the Revolutionary War, they wrote and affirmed with sacred honor the Declaration of Independence. The words below from that historic document tied to our country’s founding seem to mimic in some part at least, to what might be compelling the Sovereign Citizens to opt out of the current rule of law.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Framed in this light, are the Sovereign Citizens really that bad or just that misunderstood by the current authorities?
Make it two consecutive days that the Daily Press editorial team has impressed me. Yesterday they wrote of the recent failure on the part of the GOP. (See immediate preceding blog post).
Today, they share their criticism of the York County Board of Supervisors / administrator for announcing a real estate tax hike on already financially reeling citizen tax payers. I could not agree more with their admonishment.
Digby Solomon the publisher and Rebeeca Troyer the Editor of the editorial page both deserve credit and positive acknowledgement for their willingness to provide relevant and provoking commentary that is so unlike the majority of mainstream media outlets.
The societal struggles we currently face are doomed to perpetuate unless leaders of our communities are willing to boldly face the brutal facts of our current situation and bring light to the problems when they need to be aired. What Mr. Solomon and Ms. Troyer are doing with their editorials the last two days is nothing short of heroic leadership for their community. I hope they continue to be a leading voice of reason as it will spark the debates needed to advance the solutions.
Here is their opinion today. http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-edt-yorkbudget-editorial-20120222,0,1773062.story
…needs to come to its senses; right now it’s circling the drain
http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-edt-ripgop-editorial-20120221,0,7473479.story
How refreshing to see a major media source that shares my very Libertarian like opinion. Before too long, I wouldn’t be surprised to see them giving Ron Paul more attention.
I was happy to see two media accounts this morning about the issue of property rights. One an article about a home owner in Yorktown, VA battling his local government for his right to use his rural residential zoned home that has permitted use for agriculture so that he can operate an oyster business (aquaculture). This battle has been underway for sometime now. The update this morning is that a well known local civil rights activist is now putting his weight behind the property owner.
The other is national syndicated columnist George Will and his thoughts relating to rent control laws in NYC.
I hope both stories spark an interest on the part of property rights activists and supporters that can lead to all levels of government recognizing that a person’s right to use their property as they so choose is a fundamental component of being free.
Here are links to the stories. Please, if you are so moved, please take a moment and think about writing a letter to the editor for your local newspaper or to your local government representative at the local, state, and/or federal level and tell them that in no uncertain terms, you favor laws that safeguard the rights of property owners from government theft and control. A very fast and convenient method of writing your congress representatives and senators is to go to http://www.downsizedc.org and use their tools for doing so. They also offer many tips on what you can put in your letters.
We all tend to have unfinished or uninitiated activities or tasks or things that we would like to get around to doing some day. If we had the luxury of all the time in the world, we could continually keep from doing today what we would hope could be put off until tomorrow. Unfortunately, we know all too well that none of us is promised tomorrow. During the year 2010, one particular as yet to be completed task on my list was beginning to gnaw at me. I had yet to read Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged.
Someone carrying not yet completed desired to-do tasks around in their mind was popularized as a person having a”Bucket List”. This came about several years ago after actors Morgan Freeman and Jack Nicholson teamed up on the big screen to make a movie about two aging men and the stories behind them acting out some of the activities on their list of things to do.
As a liberty minded individualist who first learned about Atlas Shrugged years ago from my good friend Gerry back when I was just starting high school, I grew into adulthood simply thinking that I did not have the time to read it. How silly of me.
Once I finally got a copy and started reading it just 2 years ago, what I once thought was going to be a labored read turned into a labor of love with the book. The labor was simply the time needed to read it. Once started, I found I could not put the book down. It was both a philosophical work and an adventure story all rolled into one. Like most other things we procrastinate from doing, I found and made time to read it once I realized I enjoyed it. How silly of me to put it off in favor of what I thought was my busy schedule.
My reading sessions turned into an escape of sorts. I completed it in about 2-3 weeks, taking about an hour or so daily. Looking back at the time, Atlas Shrugged served as a balm of sorts for what ailed me insofar as my complete sullied attitude and morale relating to the bad economy, our federal debt, President Obama’s and Harry Reid’s and Nancy Pelosi’s individual health care mandate in the Affordable Healthcare Act, the wars and our country’s overall malaise. Reading this book helped me see that these problems that are in part based on collectivism and statism are not new. Ayn Rand wrote of them in the 1950’s. It helped me refocus my mind as to how I might better cope with what seems the the degradation of our free society. In many respects, it had me rethink about dedicating some time to writing this blog.
One of my favorite parts of the book was Francisco’s money speech. Not coincidentally, other readers must also have enjoyed it, as it was very easy to find numerous references to it with a simple google search. I have provided the link to it below so that it might serve as a primer of sorts for you. After reading it, maybe reading Atlas Shrugged will be something that you will add to your bucket list. This topic of sound money is very appropriate for our times. Many mainstream economists are proclaiming that the recession is ending and that our economy is headed in the right direction. Those of us who look at the economy through the lens of the Austrian school of thought think otherwise. The threat of a third round of quantitative easing looms and with it, our beloved freedoms take even more of a beating. Candidate Ron Paul holds the issue of sound monetary policy as a main component of his platform for restoring America.
Please take a moment and read Ayn Rand’s views on money, as told by one of her amazing characters, Francisco D’Anconia. And as usual, thanks for reading my thoughts here at Wake Up America!
Living in America 